Practical training on AI mistakes

AI sounds just as sure of itself when it's wrong.

Most people can't tell the difference. That's how made-up facts, wrong numbers, and bad advice end up in emails, school papers, health decisions, and work with your name on it. Applied AI Education Group teaches everyday people and organizations how AI gets things wrong, how to spot it, and simple habits that catch it before it causes trouble.

For individuals, families, businesses, schools, and community organizations. Based on research into how these tools fail in everyday use, not in polished demos. Education and training only. Not an audit, certification, or compliance service.

Why this matters now

Almost everyone's using these tools. Almost nobody's been shown how they fail.

And it's showing up everywhere: in homework, in emails, in answers to health questions, and in work that goes out with someone's name on it.

A$440,000
consulting report to a government client, partially refunded after fake citations and a made-up court quote were found in it
Deloitte Australia, 2025
32.5%
of workers who use AI on the job say they've passed off AI-generated work as their own
WalkMe AI at Work Pulse Survey, 2026
24.6%
of those same workers say AI gets it right on the first try, yet 90% say they feel confident using it
WalkMe AI at Work Pulse Survey, 2026
56%
of US employees haven't received any AI training, and a third of those whose employer encourages AI use get none
Cornerstone / Dynata, 2025

The problem

This isn't a tech problem that the next version will fix.

These tools don't look anything up. They guess what words should come next, based on patterns in everything they were trained on. Ask about something common and the guess is usually right. Ask about something specific, recent, or local, like a medication, a law in your state, or a company's return policy, and the tool fills the gap anyway, in the same confident voice, with a fact or a source that doesn't exist. That's how they're built. It's not a bug that's about to be fixed.

Made-up answers get past people because they don't look wrong. Clean sentences and a tidy layout are exactly what we all use to decide whether something can be trusted. Those instincts are good at catching sloppy writing. They're not built to catch polished writing that's just plain false.

Waiting for a better version won't solve this. Better tools will be wrong less often, and more convincingly.

The core material

Seven ways AI gets things wrong that nobody tells you about

Most AI tips treat "making things up" as one problem that'll go away as the tools get better. It isn't one problem, and it won't just go away. Everyday use, whether you're checking a symptom, writing a cover letter, planning a budget, or drafting a report, turns up a handful of different mistakes, and they tend to feed off each other the longer you keep going.

Not one problem

Seven different patterns

Each one has its own warning signs. Sessions cover all seven, with live examples on the tools you already use.

Not fixed by the next update

Built in, not a glitch

Several of these come from how the tools work, not from a bug that more data will clean up. They've survived every new version and every fix the companies have released so far.

Not obvious

They don't look like mistakes

Smooth writing and a sensible layout are exactly what make us trust something. That's why being smart or experienced doesn't protect you on its own.

What you'll learn to do

Knowing AI makes mistakes isn't the same as catching them

Everyone's heard that AI makes things up. Catching it in your own email or report, when you're busy and it reads perfectly fine, is a skill. It takes practice, not a lecture.

A simple routine

Five steps, in order

You'll learn a five-step check that's quick enough to use when you're in a hurry, and specific enough to catch the three main ways AI answers go wrong. It fits on an index card.

Practiced, not just explained

On your own stuff

Bring something you actually made with AI: an email, a letter, a school assignment, a work report. You'll check it yourself, during the session, and find the problems on your own instead of watching someone point them out on a slide.

Grows with the stakes

Three checkpoints

For bigger or more important work, the routine covers three moments: before you ask the AI anything, while you're working with it, and once you've got a finished draft. No single check catches everything. The overlap is what makes it work.

You know your life and your work. I know how these tools fail.

This won't make you better at your job, and it isn't meant to. You already have what it takes to spot a wrong number, a fake source, or advice that doesn't add up. What's usually missing is knowing where to look, and having practiced before it really mattered. That's the part I teach.

No method catches everything. The goal is to make catching mistakes a habit instead of luck.

Sessions

How the training works

Live, in person or online. Every session uses real AI answers, including yours, instead of slides about AI in general.

For organizations

Workshops

90 minutes to a full day · on site or online

Your people bring real things they've made with AI. They learn the failure patterns, then go through their own work and find the problems themselves. They leave with a routine they can use the next morning and show a coworker.

  • Fluent and Wrong. A 90-minute session on the failure patterns
  • Catching It Before It Ships. Half day, hands-on, up to 25 people
  • Team Practice. Full day, including how your group agrees on a shared standard
For individuals and community groups

Talks and open sessions

Libraries, community centers, parent groups, associations, conferences, and small online groups

The same material for anyone who uses AI at home, at school, or at work and wants to stop trusting answers they can't stand behind. No tech background needed. I won't tell you to stop using these tools, just where they break.

  • Community and library talks
  • Keynotes and conference sessions
  • Small-group online workshops
What this is. Applied AI Education Group provides education and training. It doesn't audit, certify, validate, or verify any organization, document, system, or person, doesn't issue credentials or certifications, and doesn't give legal, medical, or compliance advice. Participants stay responsible for their own work, judgments, and decisions about whether and how to use any AI system.

Who this is for

Anyone who relies on what AI tells them

Everyday users

Parents, students, job seekers, retirees: anyone using AI to write a letter, look into a health question, plan a budget, or help with homework. You don't need to be technical.

Working professionals

Small business owners, office staff, real estate agents, consultants: anyone who drafts with AI and puts their name on the result. The examples are tailored to your field.

Teams and leaders

Owners and managers who want to know what their organization is exposed to when staff use AI, and what a realistic fix looks like.

Institutions

Schools, libraries, nonprofits, health systems, and local government, where a wrong answer can reach the public, a patient, or a permanent record, and is hard to take back.

About

Hector V. Ramos, PhD

Applied AI Education Group is the teaching practice of Hector V. Ramos, PhD.

His research looks at how these tools fail when people use them for real things, not in demos. Some mistakes come up often enough to teach directly. Others don't, and no checklist would've caught them. That's why the sessions build judgment instead of handing out a list.

The teaching practice exists because the research points to something practical. The gap isn't rules or policy. It's skill. Most people using these tools have never been shown how they fail, and have never practiced catching it when they're short on time. That's what the sessions do.

Background

  • PhD; Associate Professor of Research
  • Research methods and how people interact with AI
  • Training built from original research on how AI tools fail in real-world use

Get in touch

Tell me how you're using AI.

Most sessions start with a short call about how you or your group actually use AI today, what's already gone wrong, and what a session should focus on.

Your message goes straight to Hector. No list, no newsletter.